Shit Eaters part deux

Re: Shit Eaters part deux

Postby peck » Mon Aug 10, 2009 6:01 pm

It's harder to give your spotters the 'accidental' nut shot though.
User avatar
peck
Corundum
 
Posts: 1199
Joined: Thu Aug 12, 2004 6:14 pm

Re: Shit Eaters part deux

Postby abo » Mon Aug 10, 2009 7:34 pm

"yeah, I never get the whole libertarian ideal
and, can you imagine what it would be like if each county contained the highest law of the land..."

"As Charles Bukowski once said..."

"the negative connotation on "big government" is baloney."

"what's even better is taking "no government intervention" to its logical conclusion - total anarchy."

"paying a few percent higher taxes for public services"


Vlad Lenin was right. You people have been and will continue to be very useful.

Wildbeast has you pegged. How does that make you feel.

By the way, how are his promises about leaving Iraq treating you?
How about his promise for a new era of transparency, you know, the promised 5-day public review of any major legislation? The line by line accounting to all legislation?
How do you like how he's handled his promise to end warrentless wiretapping? Which he expanded!
How about his statement that, under this health care act, we can still have private health insurance?
What's your assessment of how the closing of Gitmo is going?
How about his promise that no american, making less that 250K will see an increase in "any taxes", "not a dime!"
That is a lot of shit to eat.
why are you eating this shit?
abo
Apatite
 
Posts: 60
Joined: Fri Jul 02, 2004 7:28 pm

Re: Shit Eaters part deux

Postby bazo qop » Mon Aug 10, 2009 7:38 pm

Wildbeast has you pegged. How does that make you feel.


Troll'd I think..
User avatar
bazo qop
Corundum
 
Posts: 459
Joined: Wed Jan 28, 2004 4:14 pm
Location: Lexington Fucking Kentucky

Re: Shit Eaters part deux

Postby kidjan » Mon Aug 10, 2009 8:24 pm

abo wrote:Vlad Lenin was right. You people have been and will continue to be very useful.

Wildbeast has you pegged. How does that make you feel.


It sort of makes me feel like this theory is spot on:

Image

Now please, fuck off. WB is a total tard, always has been, always will be; homeboy is like an autistic, sloppy-drunk carbon copy of Forrest Gump. If you seriously think some random d00d on a message board spouting out Lincon quotes between incoherent shit talking babble has anyone "pegged," you are obviously the dumbest motherfucker on the face of the planet. well, second only to WB. who will undoubtedly entertain all of us by posting some expletitive ridden manifesto. which will undoubtedly make me lol.

you may continue being a douchebag now
kidjan
Gypsum
 
Posts: 8
Joined: Sat Apr 20, 2002 10:23 pm
Location: EARTH

Re: Shit Eaters part deux

Postby bazo qop » Mon Aug 10, 2009 8:27 pm

As I said....troll'd.





Nothing to be done.
User avatar
bazo qop
Corundum
 
Posts: 459
Joined: Wed Jan 28, 2004 4:14 pm
Location: Lexington Fucking Kentucky

Re: Shit Eaters part deux

Postby abo » Mon Aug 10, 2009 8:32 pm

I have not been rude. I'm attempting to enter an interesting discussion. Wildbeast was right. You won't address the points that I've brought up. You are pegged.
abo
Apatite
 
Posts: 60
Joined: Fri Jul 02, 2004 7:28 pm

Re: Shit Eaters part deux

Postby Lox » Mon Aug 10, 2009 9:11 pm

I actually like this abo kid. First off, he's a wildbeastcocksucker who is basically doing what beast has always accused people of doing to me: propping up the argument regardless of how stupid it makes them sound. But, in classic WB form, this kid comes with his own homoerotic innuendo and bad grammar. Peep it:

abo wrote:Wildbeast has you pegged. How does that make you feel.


The only thing Wild Beast "has pegged" is evey illegal Guatemalan busboy from the Ridgecrest Flying J truckstop in the last 2 years. Ever since he "visited" peck in Washington, he's been insatiable.

How did you feel, typing about Wildbeast pegging someone? Did you sweat? Did you feel nervous yet relieved? Did any of your clothes feel too tight?

Oh hey, President Obama! He's slightly more liberal than a Cali-conservative! Let me assure you, I cannot speak about Obama without mentioning the last decade. Even your first question shows the policy he inherited is as important as the policy he creates.

>>>By the way, how are his promises about leaving Iraq treating you?

I do not want us to leave Iraq. This was a far-left dreamworld that we would just up and leave. Duh. Did you hear Iraq asked Iran about releasing U.S. journalists? That shit is no accident. I think that once the war was initiated, this was inevitable. I'm cool with it. I like the possibility of negotiating gas prices through Iraq as a puppet government for our fossil fuel interests. I'm actually kinda like GO BUSH on this one, as he saw the way to make this happen. More evil than the evil dictator. U-S-A! U-S-A!

>>>How about his promise for a new era of transparency, you know, the promised 5-day public review of any major legislation? The line by line accounting to all legislation?

Congress rushes things through and then the process slows them down. Some people other than President Obama are more aggressive in trying to "ram policy down our throats." Luckily, it seems like enough lawmakers understand that we can't just pay for everything we want in times like these, so they are more concientious of fiscal impacts of legislation. Unfortunately, in Arizona, our liberal state governor who governed in a time of prosperity, created "permanent" programs which must now be cut due to low tax revenue and tight budgets. We are seeing this across the board, which is good. This health care bill was supposed to be passed already, and it's gone to extra innings. Hopefully, it gets read. The level of debate indicates it has been.

>>>How do you like how he's handled his promise to end warrentless wiretapping? Which he expanded!

Yeah, I agree that's bullshit. But... when the government gets power like that, it is loathe to relenquish it. Reports show it has little worth. I think it's programs like this that don't have good value that should be cut. As a neo-con, you should appreciate this funding. You demanded it. You got it.

>>>How about his statement that, under this health care act, we can still have private health insurance?

I do not support the health care bill AT ALL. I think it would be bad policy and detrimental to us all. I hope it gets voted down. Congress is all over the place with this thing and hopefully he vetos whatever manages to make it through both houses, because it will invariably be bad.

>>>What's your assessment of how the closing of Gitmo is going?

Good! Screw having that much executive power. Give them due process and then if they repeat offend, I dunno... supermax their asses in Florida or someplace there is no bouldering. The Worthless Zones. I've always supported building a terror-specific supermax in Alaska and taking responsibility for these prisoners. Put them where it's a two-day walk to civilization and you freeze to death every night of the year.

>>>How about his promise that no american, making less that 250K will see an increase in "any taxes", "not a dime!"

Taxes go up. Welcome to life. If you believed the shit either candidate was saying to get elected... you have no right to call anyone else an idiot.

>>>Why are you eating this shit?

I think people support this "shit" because the rhetoric coming from the neo-conservatives is quite hypocritical, the leadership was secretive, and the quality of life had not significantly improved over the decade, despite people being duped into thinking it had by artificially grown markets. The Republican party had squandered their time to shine, following Bill Clinton's era, and people wanted a return to that. We currently have the celebrity Prez, but the fiscal responsibility and job growth is missing.

If the Republican leaders had any clue, they would have never allowed TARP or allowed the Palin pick or massively expanded the executive branch powers. If the base had any clue, they would have demanded fiscal responsibility when they had the leadership in place to make that happen. And now they are flipping their domes because hindsight is 20/20 vision, neo-cons are outed as non-family-values gay-sex-soliciting deficit-spending liberals, and their spending demands have been deprioritized.

The most hilarious part is the neo-McCarthyism. When you have no other factual and good material to bring to the discourse, wildly point your finger and call everyone who disagrees with you a "communist" to discredit them.

Personally, I don't think WB is a troll. I think he is a sad little bald, fat man who deals with california liberals all day at work and has no other place to express his rage, so he comes here. He makes wild accusations, insults members of the community, and "fails to grasp" the most basic points if he cannot refute them. It's classic "short man" behavior, combined with anonymity, and a decade of being butthurt about never ever climbing as hard as I climb. What to do for this troll? Honor his sad little life with 15 minutes of shit-out prose. It is the least I can do to give his life some small meaning. Fun times.
User avatar
Lox
Diamond
 
Posts: 6559
Joined: Mon Apr 01, 2002 7:00 pm
Location: Fleazag4sheezag.

Re: Shit Eaters part deux

Postby kidjan » Mon Aug 10, 2009 9:20 pm

abo wrote:I'm attempting to enter an interesting discussion.


yes, because clearly this is a forum where interesting, insightful debate occurs
kidjan
Gypsum
 
Posts: 8
Joined: Sat Apr 20, 2002 10:23 pm
Location: EARTH

Re: Shit Eaters part deux

Postby pmahnn » Mon Aug 10, 2009 9:25 pm

Doosh, man, dedication. You deserve some internet award.
Image
User avatar
pmahnn
Diamond
 
Posts: 4661
Joined: Mon Apr 01, 2002 7:00 pm
Location: Chicago, IL

Re: Shit Eaters part deux

Postby wild beast » Mon Aug 10, 2009 10:37 pm

i just did this to get you riled. i knew i wasn't going to convert anyone and didn't intend. it was pure riling bullshit. and i'll do it.. the way you villified former POTUS Bush was horrible. wishing him dead and worse. sickening.

i am just throwing in your face what you threw in conservatives. nothing. more.

lox, read some of what you wrote, but it was a bit verbose and the attack was personal. clearly you were wielding your "man with a forked penis" syndrome.


old man wrote:..
I wonder what shitstain's co-workers would say if they read his shitspray?


tsk tsk. you are the type of hate filled person that woulda signed up for the nazi or communist "people police" and been ratting on your neighbor if they didn't agree with you. you are sick hate filled person. horrible. you s/b ashamed of yourself.

so i am bored with this thread. most of the country is starting to come to their senses about this heinous health care plan anyways.
User avatar
wild beast
Diamond
 
Posts: 4351
Joined: Wed Feb 26, 2003 12:23 am
Location: Mojave Desert

Re: Shit Eaters part deux

Postby Lox » Mon Aug 10, 2009 10:48 pm

Hahahahahhaha...

Retreat !!!11 RETREAT !!!!!!!!!!1111111

Cut-n-run, little buddy. It's all good. We all kind knew you couldn't really bring it, and your bullshit is nothing but pure bullshit. No one is riled up, except you. Volumes of shiteater posts evidence your rage.

Anyway... props to actually being a human being, even if you come off looking weak in the process. Perhaps you are not as short as I thought (and you appear in your photos).
User avatar
Lox
Diamond
 
Posts: 6559
Joined: Mon Apr 01, 2002 7:00 pm
Location: Fleazag4sheezag.

Re: Shit Eaters part deux

Postby wild beast » Mon Aug 10, 2009 11:16 pm

well.. i mean even i get burned out on the shit eater thing. i wouldn't call it retreat tho. it just got old. i couldn't play it any longer.

i gotta figure out my next troll.. this one played out. caused all sorts of rage from you bitches. but it no longer amuses me.

it's difficult, ya know? sometimes i really gotta lay it on y'all thick. a few jabs and pokes don't get you riled. i really gotta drop it like an A-bomb.

we'll see the next big political blunder comes up and i'll be throwing it down most likely.
User avatar
wild beast
Diamond
 
Posts: 4351
Joined: Wed Feb 26, 2003 12:23 am
Location: Mojave Desert

Re: Shit Eaters part deux

Postby abo » Mon Aug 10, 2009 11:28 pm

"I actually like this abo kid. First off, he's a wildbeastcocksucker who is basically doing what beast has always accused people of doing to me: propping up the argument regardless of how stupid it makes them sound. But, in classic WB form, this kid comes with his own homoerotic innuendo and bad grammar."
Hi Lox. Thanks for the welcome. I haven't looked up "pegging" yet, but I bet it's funny.

"I do not want us to leave Iraq. This was a far-left dreamworld that we would just up and leave. Duh."
I don't care what you think about what we should do. I care about what you think about Obama's camaign promises.

" Some people other than President Obama are more aggressive in trying to "ram policy down our throats."

That's the funniest thing I've read all day. Keep em coming.

"Yeah, I agree that's bullshit. But... when the government gets power like that, it is loathe to relenquish it. Reports show it has little worth. I think it's programs like this that don't have good value that should be cut. As a neo-con, you should appreciate this funding. You demanded it. You got it. "
Again, you have judged my values and line of reasoning in a pathetic manner. You are acting like an idiot, a useful one at that.

"Taxes go up."
That is a fact of life. Why do you defend a president that promises the opposite?

Sorry for my grammar lox. I don't have much formal education, but y'all have no excuse.
abo
Apatite
 
Posts: 60
Joined: Fri Jul 02, 2004 7:28 pm

Re: Shit Eaters part deux

Postby drater » Tue Aug 11, 2009 10:38 am

wild beast wrote:drater, you are no different than any other shit eater that has nothing to say but chooses to pollute something with disgusting shit.


Fuck you, cunt! I voted for McSame, not because I believed in anything he (the old money corporations behind the GOP) stood for but because I truly didn't want Obama (and the new money regime behind him...reparations anyone?) to become president. Politics doesn't change, it's always been (and always will) be about the few raping the many. Now it's just a different gang of rapists. In retrospect, I would cast my vote for a third party candidate in hopes that it would be one more infinitely small step in bringing about the end of the two party system. That would be the true "change" this country neeeds. And my gif upthread was the most valid thing posted in this thread until NP and Lox's works of art. Here's another one for you Beastie, think about the kittens!

Image
User avatar
drater
Diamond
 
Posts: 1875
Joined: Wed Apr 06, 2005 6:03 pm
Location: LPO

Re: Shit Eaters part deux

Postby wild beast » Tue Aug 11, 2009 10:48 am

so yer a loxcocksucker, eh? not at all surprised.
User avatar
wild beast
Diamond
 
Posts: 4351
Joined: Wed Feb 26, 2003 12:23 am
Location: Mojave Desert

Re: Shit Eaters part deux

Postby Lox » Tue Aug 11, 2009 11:51 am

Abo... I'm not "defending" Obama. I agree with him on some things and disagree on other things. I also understand that not every campaign promise will be kept, and if you believe that or just a U.S. President based on that, you will be let down 100% of the time. I guess I just take a more realistic view of things... kind of like Drater, but with a little different outcome in my behavior. I personally dislike McCain, and saw a vote for him as a vote for neo-conservative hypocritical liberalism. I'd rather have a less partisan President who has sensible rhetoric, rather then crusade against the Evil of the world behind another napoleonic Decider.

And yes, welcome to the forum. Look up pegging to expand your vocabulary, or better yet just ask Peck to describe it to you in a PM.

And hey... don't worry about your formal education. You've already proven yourself to be more reasonable, articulate, and coherent that wild beast.
User avatar
Lox
Diamond
 
Posts: 6559
Joined: Mon Apr 01, 2002 7:00 pm
Location: Fleazag4sheezag.

Re: Shit Eaters part deux

Postby drater » Tue Aug 11, 2009 11:59 am

wild beast wrote:so yer a loxcocksucker, eh? not at all surprised.


Totally d00d, I gargle cheese off his ballsack every chance I get. Or maybe I'm just pleasantly suprised when I find an entertaining, well written treatise on the subject matter instead of the usual drivel I expect to find in any of your threads. Same to me...
User avatar
drater
Diamond
 
Posts: 1875
Joined: Wed Apr 06, 2005 6:03 pm
Location: LPO

Re: Shit Eaters part deux

Postby Lox » Tue Aug 11, 2009 1:29 pm

Because I enjoy a good laugh... I'll post this FWD from my dad.

Did you know:

That the words race car spelled backward says race car.

That eat is the only word that if you take the 1st letter and move it to the last, it spells it's past tense ate.

And

Have you noticed that if you rearrange the letters in "illegal immigrants," and add just a few more letters, it spells out:

"Fuck off and go home you free-loading, benefit grabbing, kid producing, violent, non-English speaking cocksuckers and take those hairy faced, sandal wearing, bomb making, goat fucking, smelly rag head bastards with you."

How weird is that?
User avatar
Lox
Diamond
 
Posts: 6559
Joined: Mon Apr 01, 2002 7:00 pm
Location: Fleazag4sheezag.

Re: Shit Eaters part deux

Postby Lox » Tue Aug 11, 2009 2:53 pm

Texas hippies.

My dad acutually supports a healthy border policy that allows for a transer of goods and labor across the border. He just has a sense of humor...

And my uncle FWDs every bit of misinformation coming from the nutcase whacko right. The dude thinks World Net Daily is a more reliable source of information than Wikipedia.
User avatar
Lox
Diamond
 
Posts: 6559
Joined: Mon Apr 01, 2002 7:00 pm
Location: Fleazag4sheezag.

Re: Shit Eaters part deux

Postby pmahnn » Tue Aug 11, 2009 3:02 pm

Speaking of hippies, my girlfriend's dad used to own a head shop back in the day.
User avatar
pmahnn
Diamond
 
Posts: 4661
Joined: Mon Apr 01, 2002 7:00 pm
Location: Chicago, IL

PreviousNext

Return to Bouldering

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests

cron