I actually like this abo kid. First off, he's a wildbeastcocksucker who is basically doing what beast has always accused people of doing to me: propping up the argument regardless of how stupid it makes them sound. But, in classic WB form, this kid comes with his own homoerotic innuendo and bad grammar. Peep it:
abo wrote:Wildbeast has you pegged. How does that make you feel.
The only thing Wild Beast "has pegged" is evey illegal Guatemalan busboy from the Ridgecrest Flying J truckstop in the last 2 years. Ever since he "visited" peck in Washington, he's been insatiable.
How did you feel, typing about Wildbeast pegging someone? Did you sweat? Did you feel nervous yet relieved? Did any of your clothes feel too tight?
Oh hey, President Obama! He's slightly more liberal than a Cali-conservative! Let me assure you, I cannot speak about Obama without mentioning the last decade. Even your first question shows the policy he inherited is as important as the policy he creates.
>>>By the way, how are his promises about leaving Iraq treating you?
I do not want us to leave Iraq. This was a far-left dreamworld that we would just up and leave. Duh. Did you hear Iraq asked Iran about releasing U.S. journalists? That shit is no accident. I think that once the war was initiated, this was inevitable. I'm cool with it. I like the possibility of negotiating gas prices through Iraq as a puppet government for our fossil fuel interests. I'm actually kinda like GO BUSH on this one, as he saw the way to make this happen. More evil than the evil dictator. U-S-A! U-S-A!
>>>How about his promise for a new era of transparency, you know, the promised 5-day public review of any major legislation? The line by line accounting to all legislation?
Congress rushes things through and then the process slows them down. Some people other than President Obama are more aggressive in trying to "ram policy down our throats." Luckily, it seems like enough lawmakers understand that we can't just pay for everything we want in times like these, so they are more concientious of fiscal impacts of legislation. Unfortunately, in Arizona, our liberal state governor who governed in a time of prosperity, created "permanent" programs which must now be cut due to low tax revenue and tight budgets. We are seeing this across the board, which is good. This health care bill was supposed to be passed already, and it's gone to extra innings. Hopefully, it gets read. The level of debate indicates it has been.
>>>How do you like how he's handled his promise to end warrentless wiretapping? Which he expanded!
Yeah, I agree that's bullshit. But... when the government gets power like that, it is loathe to relenquish it. Reports show it has little worth. I think it's programs like this that don't have good value that should be cut. As a neo-con, you should appreciate this funding. You demanded it. You got it.
>>>How about his statement that, under this health care act, we can still have private health insurance?
I do not support the health care bill AT ALL. I think it would be bad policy and detrimental to us all. I hope it gets voted down. Congress is all over the place with this thing and hopefully he vetos whatever manages to make it through both houses, because it will invariably be bad.
>>>What's your assessment of how the closing of Gitmo is going?
Good! Screw having that much executive power. Give them due process and then if they repeat offend, I dunno... supermax their asses in Florida or someplace there is no bouldering. The Worthless Zones. I've always supported building a terror-specific supermax in Alaska and taking responsibility for these prisoners. Put them where it's a two-day walk to civilization and you freeze to death every night of the year.
>>>How about his promise that no american, making less that 250K will see an increase in "any taxes", "not a dime!"
Taxes go up. Welcome to life. If you believed the shit either candidate was saying to get elected... you have no right to call anyone else an idiot.
>>>Why are you eating this shit?
I think people support this "shit" because the rhetoric coming from the neo-conservatives is quite hypocritical, the leadership was secretive, and the quality of life had not significantly improved over the decade, despite people being duped into thinking it had by artificially grown markets. The Republican party had squandered their time to shine, following Bill Clinton's era, and people wanted a return to that. We currently have the celebrity Prez, but the fiscal responsibility and job growth is missing.
If the Republican leaders had any clue, they would have never allowed TARP or allowed the Palin pick or massively expanded the executive branch powers. If the base had any clue, they would have demanded fiscal responsibility when they had the leadership in place to make that happen. And now they are flipping their domes because hindsight is 20/20 vision, neo-cons are outed as non-family-values gay-sex-soliciting deficit-spending liberals, and their spending demands have been deprioritized.
The most hilarious part is the neo-McCarthyism. When you have no other factual and good material to bring to the discourse, wildly point your finger and call everyone who disagrees with you a "communist" to discredit them.
Personally, I don't think WB is a troll. I think he is a sad little bald, fat man who deals with california liberals all day at work and has no other place to express his rage, so he comes here. He makes wild accusations, insults members of the community, and "fails to grasp" the most basic points if he cannot refute them. It's classic "short man" behavior, combined with anonymity, and a decade of being butthurt about never ever climbing as hard as I climb. What to do for this troll? Honor his sad little life with 15 minutes of shit-out prose. It is the least I can do to give his life some small meaning. Fun times.