niceporch wrote:Bug wrote:you should go to a place like North of Lake Superior, to see the billion square miles or so of boulders that no-one has or will ever climb once, much less twice. The mark you'd make is, like they say, pissing in the ocean.
Dude, There are so many boulders out there to climb coming along all the time, you don't have to worry about that, just climb, boulders will come.
let's be realistic. most people don't live near an endless boulder field.
for them, the Global Bouldering FA Database would add an extra dimension to the sport, to their local crag.
and if you're not into seeking and scrubbing, you'd at least be able to find cool stuff "not in the guide". you're being idealistic.
bug is right on this one. north shore of lake superior is untapped. basically zero development, except right around thunder bay. the rest of it is either ice or multipitch trad over the lake. but the boulders have been neglected.
the most obvious potential is at cape gargantua, jackfish creek, and pukaskwa. nice car camping, 5km beaches to oneself. some kind of boat would help access to island boulders (e.g picture island at pukaskwa) but the lake can easily kill you. also they're surfing up there now. global warming has made the lake swimmable.
i like the uncertainty of first ascents. you walk up to something, especially if it's an obvious line, and then try. last week, new schist, scooped overhanging fin up to roof, looks super easy. thinking 'maybe work the moves and come back with a camera for the top out'. for history and all. heheheheh. denied. the first ascent makes things more basic than egos and numbers allow.
in terms of the idea of a database, that would be a mission. it's a challenge to find out who did something first even within a local climbing ommunity. but maybe interesting to start asking those questions at a distance. i think people would generally like to have those kinds of questions asked of them.